Is Obama making us the largest State Sponsor of terror by giving the Mullahs $150 billion–with every expectation they continue funding groups like Hezbollah? Sadly, the answer is yes.
Iran has also demonstrated an unwavering commitment to building nuclear weapons, enriching uranium in violation of international treaties and proliferating ballistic missiles with which to deliver weapons of mass destruction.
We must oppose any deal with Iran that doesn’t end their illegal nuclear weapons program and stop their sponsorship of Jihadist terrorism.
Unfortunately, the Obama administration treats Iran as a rational partner for peace. Since Mr. Obama became president he has been so desperate to achieve a nuclear agreement with Iran that his administration has been prepared to make any concession and ignore all bad behavior by Iran to get a legacy nuclear agreement. Obama administration officials have also repeatedly misled and lied about what they have agreed to in the nuclear talks with Iran.
In short, President Obama’s nuclear diplomacy with Iran will concede the bomb to Tehran.
The world cannot afford a nuclear-armed Iran run by Mullahs who believe that triggering a series of cataclysmic events will bring about the return of the 12th Imam to cleanse the world of infidels and those who are not sufficiently faithful. That means most of you reading this, Muslims and non-believers alike.
Is the nuclear agreement between the United States and Iran a good or bad deal? Would it be harder or easier for Iran to develop nuclear weapons? Would it make Iran and its terror proxies stronger or weaker? Should the U.S. Congress support or defeat the deal? Dennis Prager answers these questions and more.
If this is what Iran’s supreme leader sounds like after signing the deal with the west, what is the Ayatollah’s Iran going to act like when it gets richer and stronger as a result of it?
“The Nuclear Deal With Iran: Unanswered Questions”
1. The Nuclear Deal With Iran: Unanswered Questions
2. Why are sanctions that took years to put in place being removed before Iran has established a record of sustained compliance with the agreement over time?
3. Are sanctions being removed in phases, as the P5+1 claims, or all at once, as Iran claims?
4. Is it not true that Iran can reverse virtually all the “concessions” it is making in a few weeks or months, while crippling sanctions, once removed, will take years to put back into place?
5. Given Iran’s track record of concealing illicit nuclear activities, why are inspectors not being allowed to conduct surprise inspections anywhere, anytime?
6. Will Iran finally have to come clean about its past weaponization efforts (PMD) or will it continue to be allowed to stonewall the IAEA?
7. Why is the lifting of restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in about a decade not linked to a change in its regime’s behavior?
8. How can the international community agree to allow the removal of most of the deal’s restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program even if Iran remains a terror sponsoring regime?
9. What will be the fate of Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium?
10. Why will Iran be allowed to continue R&D on centrifuges far more advanced than those currently in its possession?
11. Why doesn’t the framework address Iran’s intercontinental ballistic missile program, the sole purpose of which is to carry nuclear payloads?
12. Who will judge whether Iran has violated the agreement?
13. If an Iranian violation is discovered, how will sanctions be reimposed?
14. Will the deal not encourage nuclear proliferation in the Middle East and around the world?
15. How will this deal differ from the deal in North Korea, where similar assurances were given by the international community?
16. What is to stop Iran from using the over one hundred billion dollars that will be unfrozen as part of this agreement to fund aggression and terror in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and elsewhere?
“Dont dismantle sanctions before you dismantleIran’s capacity to make a nuclear bomb”
“Saying ‘Death to America’ is easy. We need to express ‘Death to America’ with action” HassanRouhani